some artists use the process of creation as an outlet. they do not know what their creation will look like when it is complete. they simply stop when they feel finished. other artists have a specific goal in mind and they work towards that goal, using whatever tools and processes seem fitting. of course there is a broad spectrum between these two different approaches to artistic creation. i find myself somewhere in the middle, probably closer to the latter, end-focused approach.

while i can appreciate artists who have no care for their final product (an example might be jackson pollock)- in fact i have a huge amount of respect for them. i think that these types are often some of the most highly artistic and creative, out of the box people i know- i have a harder time appreciating the actual art that they create. prints that have no sense of object or subject do not hold my attention well. i feel like there should be something to get, and i'm not getting it.

i wish that these people would create prints of their artwork at several stages throughout the process, or videotape or photograph the process. i wonder if that would help me to appreciate the true creativity of this artistic approach. i also wonder if it is truly possible for an outsider (anyone except for that artist him/her self) to really know what was going on during the process of these types of creations. perhaps you would have to be able to read the mind and emotion of the artist in order to really get the art.